|| r e s e a r c h    p r o j e c t s ||

   
     


Throughout my career I have had an opportunity to be involved in a variety of research and applied projects, including participation in development of new applications, grant-funded research projects, as well as my own research.

Values and Politics: Personal Value Priorities as Predictors of Psychological and Instrumental Political Engagement (Doctoral Thesis). The values voters and political polarization in the United States, drastic changes in core societal values in Europe, the rise of religious extremism, and other phenomena witnessed by most post-industrial societies during past decades confirms that values continue to play an important role in political and social life. However, our knowledge of how and to what extent values influence political life of modern societies is very limited. In my dissertation I examined the impact of personal values on individual's general interest in politics and participation in political activities. I used modified version of the Schwartz's Values Inventory to measure values, and Roper's Survey of Political Trends to measure political participation; relationships between the variables of interest were examined using structural equation modeling. Thesis ( PDF) | Appendices ( PDF) .

Application of Weighted Deviations Heuristic to a Selection Model with Multiple Diversity Constraints (Pre-Doctoral Project, equivalent of Master Thesis, under supervision of Charles Lewis, Educational Testing Service/Fordham University). Most of decision support systems used by college admissions offices in the US are based on simple models that operate with quantitative information, since quantification of all aspects of the selection process is the best guarantee of its objectivity. Such models, however, become inefficient when in addition to selection criteria, multiple diversity constraints are imposed on non-academic factors, such as gender, ethnicity or work experience of the candidate. . The problem of incorporating diversity constraints into selection model can be resolved by introducing methods that allows for measuring and representing diversity quantitatively. In this paper, we consider weighted deviations heuristic model that allows facilitation of diversity in admissions decisions by integrating selection criteria and diversity constraints. More efficient alternative to conventional admission models, weighted deviations heuristic allows quickly assemble from the large pool of applicants the class with desired properties. This paper investigated how differences in prior distributions of scores on selection variables affect the diversity of the final class, and how adding diversity constraints affects the "quality" of the class.

Topological Structures and Games with Mixed Strategies: Application to Stock Market Games (Bachelor Diploma Thesis). This paper examined mathematical models of two common stock-market situation: assembly of optimal investment portfolio and corporate takeover with minimal stock purchase.

Differential Performance of Test Items by Geographical Regions (paper presentation, submitted for National Councils for Measurement in Education (NCME) conference, 2008, in collaboration with Deanna Morgan, College Board). Differential item functioning (DIF) occurs when examinees of the same ability level from different groups have a different probability of answering given item correctly. DIF analyses have been traditionally used for examining the fairness of tests with regard to specific populations, including but not limited to gender, age, ethnic, cultural and language groups. The objective of this research was to compare the performance of items of a nationally administered test across geographical regions and individual states within the continental United States. The premise of this study was that certain geographically-based dissimilarities among examinees may potentially result in differential performance of certain items across various parts of the US. DIF analysis was performed on individual items across geographical regions (College Board classification) and individual states, as indicated on the examinees’ records. Items were flagged for DIF based on the results of both MH and SIBTEST criteria. Further analyses, such as examination of item impact, and analyses of response patterns, have been performed to confirm DIF and identify the possible causes of DIF in some items. Download ( PDF) .

Comparison of latent class structure of SAT Reasoning Test Math and Critical Reading Item Responses for Students with and without Disabilities and across Disability Groups (paper, presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), 2007, in collaboration with Deanna Morgan, College Board). To date, various approaches have been employed for assessing test performance across certain groups. Traditional methods involve comparison of individual item scores and total test scores across the groups of interests, using ANOVA, MANOVA, t-test, hierarchical linear modeling, and other univariate and multivariate statistical techniques. However, such methods often may help to detect only quantitative differences. An alternative approach would be to examine the latent structures of the test responses, looking for structural differences across groups of interest at the parameter level. This more comprehensive analysis could help to detect important qualitative differences, which may be a sign of compromised construct validity of the test. This study examined both the quantitative and qualitative differences, by comparing the discrete latent structures of the test across examinees with and without disabilities, and examining the possible association between the latent ability class membership and disability status and type of disability.

Measuring Job Satisfaction among Graduate Assistants (in collaboration with Anthony Benners, Fordham University). The purpose of this project was to develop and validate a new instrument for measuring various aspects of job satisfaction among the graduate and research assistants. Project was partially funded by grants from the Applied Psychological Measurement/Assessment Systems, Inc. and Sodexo Campus Services.

In addition to theoretical research, I was involved in development of numerous products and solutions at Mediamark Research & Intelligence, including a number of attitudinal and behavioral segmentations and consumer typologies.